CreativeExplorer-MichaelMandaville.com

I work in Film. I live in Martial Arts. I thrive in Imagination.

Filmmaking & Writing

Scholar Warrior Way

Current Events

UN votes - earn points.

Eyes on Mars: United Nations Voting by Points

February 26, 20267 min read

Mars is attainable if we're all pulling with most of the same oars. How the hell do we do that? And then guess, each country earns votes. And if you're not actively working to earn votes, then the entire world and other country will know that you're just a fuckup of a country run by jerkoffs who should be overthrown.

Simple. Who's not tired of poseur diplomats in the UN eating at fancy restaurants and dodging their parking tickets in the US?

Two Steps. Common Understanding and a Earned Voting Points system.

First, we need a common understanding of criteria and not the usual elitist virtual signaling nonsense. Actual goals scientific in nature and defined perhaps in Encylopedia Galactica. Much like Elon shooting a Starship into the heavens, we need to approach governance like physics. We can start with 7 core principles of science to build this list:

  • Empirical Evidence: Scientific claims are based on direct observation or experimentation, not on unsupported opinions.

  • Objectivity: Scientists aim to minimize bias and personal beliefs in their work to ensure findings reflect reality.

  • Replicability/Repeatability: Experiments and studies must be able to be reproduced by other researchers to verify the results.

  • Falsifiability: A scientific hypothesis or theory must be stated in a way that it can be proven false.

  • Systematic Observation: Science relies on organized methods, such as the scientific method, to gather data.

  • Tentativeness/Changeability: Scientific knowledge is not absolute and is subject to revision or refinement as new evidence becomes available.

  • Theoretical Framework/Models: Science aims to explain natural phenomena through testable theories and models that bring coherence to empirical data.

The United Nations, once a noble experiment, is now a distorted group of elitists who engender corruption, incompetence and excess. Articles on United Nations (UN) incompetence and corruption often highlight systemic bureaucracy, lack of accountability, and failures in peacekeeping operations, such as sexual exploitation or inaction during crises. Key issues include the Security Council's failure to prevent conflicts, financial mismanagement, and resistance to transparency. You can research articles on UN corruption but here's one.

Iran dealing with human rights? Does anybody remember Oil for food scandals? Pathetic peacekeeping efforts? Sexual abuse by UN members? On and on and on. It's worse than some hyped up drama bullshit pumped by Netflix on a desperate Friday night.

But why does a country like Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Burma and others have the same vote as the United States or France or Japan? Yes, the US is on the Security Council. But I think that the United Nations needs to institute a points system.

Each country has 100 possible votes . But you have to qualify. Not sure if any country would swing the full 100 votes. The list is subject to revision.

But here's the first stab at the list.

Structured Criteria for Earning Voting Points in a Reformed United Nations System

This framework evaluates countries based on governance, human rights, economic policies, social policies, environmental efforts, defense, cultural contributions, technological advancements, global cooperation, and adherence to international laws. Each criterion is assigned a specific point value, with a total of 100 points.

Governance and Rule of Law (20 points)

  1. Spell the name of your country correctly – 1 point

  2. Transparent and fair elections – 4 points

  3. Independent judiciary – 4 points

  4. Anti-corruption measures in government – 4 points

  5. Adherence to agreed international law – 2 points

  6. No political prisoners – 3 points

  7. Equal representation in government for all citizens – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Human Rights (20 points)

  1. Freedom of press – 3 points

  2. Freedom of speech – 3 points

  3. Freedom of assembly – 3 points

  4. Freedom of religion – 3 points

  5. Human rights -other TBD – 4 points

  6. No use of torture – 2 points

  7. No child labor – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Economic Policies (10 points)

  1. Free trade agreements – 1 point

  2. Ease of starting a business – 1 point

  3. Transparent tax policies – 1 point

  4. Fair labor laws – 1 point

  5. Intellectual property protections – 1 point

  6. Open markets for foreign investment – 1 point

  7. Stable currency and low inflation – 2 points

  8. No excessive tariffs – 1 point

  9. Low corruption in trade – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Social Policies (10 points)

  1. Reasonable access to education – 2 points

  2. Reasonable access to healthcare – 2 points

  3. Gender equality in education and employment – 2 points

  4. Support for disabled individuals – 1 point

  5. Access to clean water and electricity – 2 points

  6. Affordable housing policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Environmental Policies (10 points)

  1. Commitment to reducing carbon emissions – 1 points

  2. Participation in global climate agreements – 1 point

  3. Protection of endangered species – 2 point

  4. Renewable energy initiatives – 2 points

  5. Waste management and recycling programs – 1 point

  6. Clean air and water conservation policies – 2 points

  7. Sustainable agriculture practices – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Defense and Security (10 points)

  1. Limited military actions – 3 points

  2. Participation in peacekeeping missions – 2 points

  3. Nuclear Weapons safety systems – 2 points

  4. Transparency in military spending – 1 point

  5. Cybersecurity measures – 1 point

  6. Border security – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Cultural and Educational Contributions (5 points)

  1. Protection of cultural heritage and language – 1 point

  2. Promotion of arts and culture – 1 point

  3. Support for scientific research – 1 point

  4. Scholarships for approved nternational students – 1 point

  5. Public libraries and access to knowledge – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Technological and Innovation Policies (5 points)

  1. Investment in technology and innovation – 2 points

  2. Internet access for all citizens – 1 point

  3. Data privacy protections – 1 point

  4. Ethical AI development policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Global Cooperation (5 points)

  1. Participation in infrastructure building missions – 1 point

  2. Contributions to transparent global humanitarian aid – 1 point

  3. Refugee who are verified resettlement programs – 1 point

  4. Support for global health initiatives – 1 point

  5. Commitment to Economic Development – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Miscellaneous (5 points)

  1. No human trafficking – 1 point

  2. No forced labor – 1 point

  3. No systemic racism – 1 point

  4. No gender-based violence – 1 point

  5. No state-sponsored terrorism – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Grand Total: 100 Points

Will this work perfectly? Hell no, because it was created by a human so it always works partially but it's a lot better than people sitting around and being nice to assholes in another country who abuse women, scam their economies and make extra dough on the side through deals with cartels.

Countries like Sudan and Somalia would have a long way to go. Norway could probably coast. The US, the new Republic of Alberta, most of Europe and Japan pretty good shape. But time to do something radical with transparency and accountability. You see, humanity has moved forward with amazing inventions from the industrial revolution to Starlink and everything in between. Just think of it: electricity, ships, vehicles, rockets, internet, penicillin, X rays and on and on. Thomas Edison would be proud as would Tesla and Marie Curie and the Lumiere Brothers and more.

We need to reinvent governance. Now to be clear, I am an American and believe in American sovereignty and its exceptionalism. Global governance is foolish. The EU is one example where you cannot reconcile Finns with Spaniards. The EU might be a worthy trade bloc but it's utter crap for overall governance and now is just an authoritarian junk mill of globalist asshats.

What I'm talking about is better and accountable cooperation by accountable action. Maybe this is one way. Maybe one of you geniuses has a better way. If it's better, I'll take it.

If we want to get to Mars, then radical thinking is needed. @elonmusk got Mars covered I have no doubt.

We have the hard part. We have to fix Earth.

Let's roll.

MarsUnited Nations
blog author image

Michael Mandaville

Michael is a writer, filmmaker and dedicated World War II historian who studies martial arts, action films and is learning more about VFX every single darn day. Oh and a Scholar Warrior

Back to Blog
UN votes - earn points.

Eyes on Mars: United Nations Voting by Points

February 26, 20267 min read

Mars is attainable if we're all pulling with most of the same oars. How the hell do we do that? And then guess, each country earns votes. And if you're not actively working to earn votes, then the entire world and other country will know that you're just a fuckup of a country run by jerkoffs who should be overthrown.

Simple. Who's not tired of poseur diplomats in the UN eating at fancy restaurants and dodging their parking tickets in the US?

Two Steps. Common Understanding and a Earned Voting Points system.

First, we need a common understanding of criteria and not the usual elitist virtual signaling nonsense. Actual goals scientific in nature and defined perhaps in Encylopedia Galactica. Much like Elon shooting a Starship into the heavens, we need to approach governance like physics. We can start with 7 core principles of science to build this list:

  • Empirical Evidence: Scientific claims are based on direct observation or experimentation, not on unsupported opinions.

  • Objectivity: Scientists aim to minimize bias and personal beliefs in their work to ensure findings reflect reality.

  • Replicability/Repeatability: Experiments and studies must be able to be reproduced by other researchers to verify the results.

  • Falsifiability: A scientific hypothesis or theory must be stated in a way that it can be proven false.

  • Systematic Observation: Science relies on organized methods, such as the scientific method, to gather data.

  • Tentativeness/Changeability: Scientific knowledge is not absolute and is subject to revision or refinement as new evidence becomes available.

  • Theoretical Framework/Models: Science aims to explain natural phenomena through testable theories and models that bring coherence to empirical data.

The United Nations, once a noble experiment, is now a distorted group of elitists who engender corruption, incompetence and excess. Articles on United Nations (UN) incompetence and corruption often highlight systemic bureaucracy, lack of accountability, and failures in peacekeeping operations, such as sexual exploitation or inaction during crises. Key issues include the Security Council's failure to prevent conflicts, financial mismanagement, and resistance to transparency. You can research articles on UN corruption but here's one.

Iran dealing with human rights? Does anybody remember Oil for food scandals? Pathetic peacekeeping efforts? Sexual abuse by UN members? On and on and on. It's worse than some hyped up drama bullshit pumped by Netflix on a desperate Friday night.

But why does a country like Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Burma and others have the same vote as the United States or France or Japan? Yes, the US is on the Security Council. But I think that the United Nations needs to institute a points system.

Each country has 100 possible votes . But you have to qualify. Not sure if any country would swing the full 100 votes. The list is subject to revision.

But here's the first stab at the list.

Structured Criteria for Earning Voting Points in a Reformed United Nations System

This framework evaluates countries based on governance, human rights, economic policies, social policies, environmental efforts, defense, cultural contributions, technological advancements, global cooperation, and adherence to international laws. Each criterion is assigned a specific point value, with a total of 100 points.

Governance and Rule of Law (20 points)

  1. Spell the name of your country correctly – 1 point

  2. Transparent and fair elections – 4 points

  3. Independent judiciary – 4 points

  4. Anti-corruption measures in government – 4 points

  5. Adherence to agreed international law – 2 points

  6. No political prisoners – 3 points

  7. Equal representation in government for all citizens – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Human Rights (20 points)

  1. Freedom of press – 3 points

  2. Freedom of speech – 3 points

  3. Freedom of assembly – 3 points

  4. Freedom of religion – 3 points

  5. Human rights -other TBD – 4 points

  6. No use of torture – 2 points

  7. No child labor – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Economic Policies (10 points)

  1. Free trade agreements – 1 point

  2. Ease of starting a business – 1 point

  3. Transparent tax policies – 1 point

  4. Fair labor laws – 1 point

  5. Intellectual property protections – 1 point

  6. Open markets for foreign investment – 1 point

  7. Stable currency and low inflation – 2 points

  8. No excessive tariffs – 1 point

  9. Low corruption in trade – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Social Policies (10 points)

  1. Reasonable access to education – 2 points

  2. Reasonable access to healthcare – 2 points

  3. Gender equality in education and employment – 2 points

  4. Support for disabled individuals – 1 point

  5. Access to clean water and electricity – 2 points

  6. Affordable housing policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Environmental Policies (10 points)

  1. Commitment to reducing carbon emissions – 1 points

  2. Participation in global climate agreements – 1 point

  3. Protection of endangered species – 2 point

  4. Renewable energy initiatives – 2 points

  5. Waste management and recycling programs – 1 point

  6. Clean air and water conservation policies – 2 points

  7. Sustainable agriculture practices – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Defense and Security (10 points)

  1. Limited military actions – 3 points

  2. Participation in peacekeeping missions – 2 points

  3. Nuclear Weapons safety systems – 2 points

  4. Transparency in military spending – 1 point

  5. Cybersecurity measures – 1 point

  6. Border security – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Cultural and Educational Contributions (5 points)

  1. Protection of cultural heritage and language – 1 point

  2. Promotion of arts and culture – 1 point

  3. Support for scientific research – 1 point

  4. Scholarships for approved nternational students – 1 point

  5. Public libraries and access to knowledge – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Technological and Innovation Policies (5 points)

  1. Investment in technology and innovation – 2 points

  2. Internet access for all citizens – 1 point

  3. Data privacy protections – 1 point

  4. Ethical AI development policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Global Cooperation (5 points)

  1. Participation in infrastructure building missions – 1 point

  2. Contributions to transparent global humanitarian aid – 1 point

  3. Refugee who are verified resettlement programs – 1 point

  4. Support for global health initiatives – 1 point

  5. Commitment to Economic Development – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Miscellaneous (5 points)

  1. No human trafficking – 1 point

  2. No forced labor – 1 point

  3. No systemic racism – 1 point

  4. No gender-based violence – 1 point

  5. No state-sponsored terrorism – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Grand Total: 100 Points

Will this work perfectly? Hell no, because it was created by a human so it always works partially but it's a lot better than people sitting around and being nice to assholes in another country who abuse women, scam their economies and make extra dough on the side through deals with cartels.

Countries like Sudan and Somalia would have a long way to go. Norway could probably coast. The US, the new Republic of Alberta, most of Europe and Japan pretty good shape. But time to do something radical with transparency and accountability. You see, humanity has moved forward with amazing inventions from the industrial revolution to Starlink and everything in between. Just think of it: electricity, ships, vehicles, rockets, internet, penicillin, X rays and on and on. Thomas Edison would be proud as would Tesla and Marie Curie and the Lumiere Brothers and more.

We need to reinvent governance. Now to be clear, I am an American and believe in American sovereignty and its exceptionalism. Global governance is foolish. The EU is one example where you cannot reconcile Finns with Spaniards. The EU might be a worthy trade bloc but it's utter crap for overall governance and now is just an authoritarian junk mill of globalist asshats.

What I'm talking about is better and accountable cooperation by accountable action. Maybe this is one way. Maybe one of you geniuses has a better way. If it's better, I'll take it.

If we want to get to Mars, then radical thinking is needed. @elonmusk got Mars covered I have no doubt.

We have the hard part. We have to fix Earth.

Let's roll.

MarsUnited Nations
blog author image

Michael Mandaville

Michael is a writer, filmmaker and dedicated World War II historian who studies martial arts, action films and is learning more about VFX every single darn day. Oh and a Scholar Warrior

Back to Blog
UN votes - earn points.

Eyes on Mars: United Nations Voting by Points

February 26, 20267 min read

Mars is attainable if we're all pulling with most of the same oars. How the hell do we do that? And then guess, each country earns votes. And if you're not actively working to earn votes, then the entire world and other country will know that you're just a fuckup of a country run by jerkoffs who should be overthrown.

Simple. Who's not tired of poseur diplomats in the UN eating at fancy restaurants and dodging their parking tickets in the US?

Two Steps. Common Understanding and a Earned Voting Points system.

First, we need a common understanding of criteria and not the usual elitist virtual signaling nonsense. Actual goals scientific in nature and defined perhaps in Encylopedia Galactica. Much like Elon shooting a Starship into the heavens, we need to approach governance like physics. We can start with 7 core principles of science to build this list:

  • Empirical Evidence: Scientific claims are based on direct observation or experimentation, not on unsupported opinions.

  • Objectivity: Scientists aim to minimize bias and personal beliefs in their work to ensure findings reflect reality.

  • Replicability/Repeatability: Experiments and studies must be able to be reproduced by other researchers to verify the results.

  • Falsifiability: A scientific hypothesis or theory must be stated in a way that it can be proven false.

  • Systematic Observation: Science relies on organized methods, such as the scientific method, to gather data.

  • Tentativeness/Changeability: Scientific knowledge is not absolute and is subject to revision or refinement as new evidence becomes available.

  • Theoretical Framework/Models: Science aims to explain natural phenomena through testable theories and models that bring coherence to empirical data.

The United Nations, once a noble experiment, is now a distorted group of elitists who engender corruption, incompetence and excess. Articles on United Nations (UN) incompetence and corruption often highlight systemic bureaucracy, lack of accountability, and failures in peacekeeping operations, such as sexual exploitation or inaction during crises. Key issues include the Security Council's failure to prevent conflicts, financial mismanagement, and resistance to transparency. You can research articles on UN corruption but here's one.

Iran dealing with human rights? Does anybody remember Oil for food scandals? Pathetic peacekeeping efforts? Sexual abuse by UN members? On and on and on. It's worse than some hyped up drama bullshit pumped by Netflix on a desperate Friday night.

But why does a country like Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Burma and others have the same vote as the United States or France or Japan? Yes, the US is on the Security Council. But I think that the United Nations needs to institute a points system.

Each country has 100 possible votes . But you have to qualify. Not sure if any country would swing the full 100 votes. The list is subject to revision.

But here's the first stab at the list.

Structured Criteria for Earning Voting Points in a Reformed United Nations System

This framework evaluates countries based on governance, human rights, economic policies, social policies, environmental efforts, defense, cultural contributions, technological advancements, global cooperation, and adherence to international laws. Each criterion is assigned a specific point value, with a total of 100 points.

Governance and Rule of Law (20 points)

  1. Spell the name of your country correctly – 1 point

  2. Transparent and fair elections – 4 points

  3. Independent judiciary – 4 points

  4. Anti-corruption measures in government – 4 points

  5. Adherence to agreed international law – 2 points

  6. No political prisoners – 3 points

  7. Equal representation in government for all citizens – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Human Rights (20 points)

  1. Freedom of press – 3 points

  2. Freedom of speech – 3 points

  3. Freedom of assembly – 3 points

  4. Freedom of religion – 3 points

  5. Human rights -other TBD – 4 points

  6. No use of torture – 2 points

  7. No child labor – 2 points

Subtotal: 20 points

Economic Policies (10 points)

  1. Free trade agreements – 1 point

  2. Ease of starting a business – 1 point

  3. Transparent tax policies – 1 point

  4. Fair labor laws – 1 point

  5. Intellectual property protections – 1 point

  6. Open markets for foreign investment – 1 point

  7. Stable currency and low inflation – 2 points

  8. No excessive tariffs – 1 point

  9. Low corruption in trade – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Social Policies (10 points)

  1. Reasonable access to education – 2 points

  2. Reasonable access to healthcare – 2 points

  3. Gender equality in education and employment – 2 points

  4. Support for disabled individuals – 1 point

  5. Access to clean water and electricity – 2 points

  6. Affordable housing policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Environmental Policies (10 points)

  1. Commitment to reducing carbon emissions – 1 points

  2. Participation in global climate agreements – 1 point

  3. Protection of endangered species – 2 point

  4. Renewable energy initiatives – 2 points

  5. Waste management and recycling programs – 1 point

  6. Clean air and water conservation policies – 2 points

  7. Sustainable agriculture practices – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Defense and Security (10 points)

  1. Limited military actions – 3 points

  2. Participation in peacekeeping missions – 2 points

  3. Nuclear Weapons safety systems – 2 points

  4. Transparency in military spending – 1 point

  5. Cybersecurity measures – 1 point

  6. Border security – 1 point

Subtotal: 10 points

Cultural and Educational Contributions (5 points)

  1. Protection of cultural heritage and language – 1 point

  2. Promotion of arts and culture – 1 point

  3. Support for scientific research – 1 point

  4. Scholarships for approved nternational students – 1 point

  5. Public libraries and access to knowledge – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Technological and Innovation Policies (5 points)

  1. Investment in technology and innovation – 2 points

  2. Internet access for all citizens – 1 point

  3. Data privacy protections – 1 point

  4. Ethical AI development policies – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Global Cooperation (5 points)

  1. Participation in infrastructure building missions – 1 point

  2. Contributions to transparent global humanitarian aid – 1 point

  3. Refugee who are verified resettlement programs – 1 point

  4. Support for global health initiatives – 1 point

  5. Commitment to Economic Development – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Miscellaneous (5 points)

  1. No human trafficking – 1 point

  2. No forced labor – 1 point

  3. No systemic racism – 1 point

  4. No gender-based violence – 1 point

  5. No state-sponsored terrorism – 1 point

Subtotal: 5 points

Grand Total: 100 Points

Will this work perfectly? Hell no, because it was created by a human so it always works partially but it's a lot better than people sitting around and being nice to assholes in another country who abuse women, scam their economies and make extra dough on the side through deals with cartels.

Countries like Sudan and Somalia would have a long way to go. Norway could probably coast. The US, the new Republic of Alberta, most of Europe and Japan pretty good shape. But time to do something radical with transparency and accountability. You see, humanity has moved forward with amazing inventions from the industrial revolution to Starlink and everything in between. Just think of it: electricity, ships, vehicles, rockets, internet, penicillin, X rays and on and on. Thomas Edison would be proud as would Tesla and Marie Curie and the Lumiere Brothers and more.

We need to reinvent governance. Now to be clear, I am an American and believe in American sovereignty and its exceptionalism. Global governance is foolish. The EU is one example where you cannot reconcile Finns with Spaniards. The EU might be a worthy trade bloc but it's utter crap for overall governance and now is just an authoritarian junk mill of globalist asshats.

What I'm talking about is better and accountable cooperation by accountable action. Maybe this is one way. Maybe one of you geniuses has a better way. If it's better, I'll take it.

If we want to get to Mars, then radical thinking is needed. @elonmusk got Mars covered I have no doubt.

We have the hard part. We have to fix Earth.

Let's roll.

MarsUnited Nations
blog author image

Michael Mandaville

Michael is a writer, filmmaker and dedicated World War II historian who studies martial arts, action films and is learning more about VFX every single darn day. Oh and a Scholar Warrior

Back to Blog
Image

Did You Know...

... if you improve 1/2% each day, then you will be 267% better over one year? Who can compete with that?

Setting Yourself Up for Success usually doesn't mean one big jump but rather incremental change day after day. Think of it like a ocean wave, moving far out in the Pacific with almost an undetectable push...finally with the power and grace of an ocean wave onto the beach. Create your own metaphor to embrace small habits with a huge future impact.